Divorce laws regarding property division vary widely from state to state. In Washington, the guiding principle for dividing property (and debts) is known as community property law. Below is an overview of how Washington courts generally handle the classification and division of assets and liabilities during a divorce (formally called a “dissolution” in Washington).
Washington follows a community property system. This means that, in most cases, assets and debts acquired during the marriage are jointly owned by both spouses, regardless of whose name is on the title or account.
Although Washington law starts with the concept that community property belongs to both spouses, courts have the discretion to make an equitable (fair) division rather than a strictly equal (50/50) split. In practice, an even split is common, but the court may deviate from it to achieve a fair result.
When dividing the marital estate, Washington courts look at multiple factors, such as the length of the marriage, each spouse’s economic circumstances, and future financial prospects. While the presumption is that spouses own community property equally, courts can consider issues like one spouse’s ability to generate income, health conditions, and the custody of any minor children to determine what is ultimately fair.
Separate property refers to assets each spouse brought into the marriage or acquired by gift or inheritance from a third party. The critical factor is usually whether the property has been “commingled” with community property during the marriage. For instance, if one spouse owned a home before the marriage but used community funds (joint income) for substantial renovations or mortgage payments, part of that home’s value could become community property.
Spouses may sign legally enforceable agreements outlining which assets will remain separate, even if they might otherwise be considered community property. Assuming the agreement meets Washington’s requirements (e.g., transparency of assets, no coercion, and proper execution), the court will typically honor it.
Just as assets can be community or separate property, debts in Washington may be community debts or separate debts. If a debt was incurred during the marriage for the benefit of the household, it will generally be considered community debt. If, on the other hand, a spouse had personal loans or credit card balances prior to marriage—or took on debt solely for personal interests unrelated to the community—those debts may be deemed separate.
While Washington presumes an equal interest in marital property, the final division must be “just and equitable.” Courts have wide discretion to ensure a fair outcome. For couples seeking greater control over how property and debts are allocated, an uncontested divorce (where both spouses agree on division) often offers more flexibility and lower costs. In such cases, a Community Property Agreement or similar written settlement can be presented for the judge’s approval, which typically expedites the process.
In Washington, the legal framework is explicitly designed to treat same-sex and opposite-sex couples equally. Judges must apply the same legal standards to determine child custody, property division, and spousal maintenance, ensuring that same-sex spouses receive the same protections and obligations under the law.